2011-06-07

So You're goin' to Alice, Jules?

Outlaw Junction News-Chop
110607Tu 


So You're goin' to Alice, Jules?

A few months ago, I scribed a bunch of questions in the language we might kinda hear in the federal parliament's House of Representatives or the Senate, which were imagined put to the prime minister, this week, Julia Gillard.

Sadly, I was not impressed by my autodidactic attempt to put these thoughts together, so didn't post it to the blog.

Nevertheless, as the news this morning told of our prime minister's visit to Alice Springs, and scheduled visits to the 'Aboriginal Town Camps' there, to get an eye-full of the conditions Aborigines have to endure, I am prompted to put-out those questions, because they go directly to those poorly 'white-imposed' circumstances our Most Noble Bleck Fellas have to put up with.

However, the questions go to not only the Bleck Fellas familial nuclearisation.

Indeed, the questions were formed with Aborigines and other non-mainstream members of Australian society - the Outlaw and Lower, Working Classes, etc., in mind.

But primarily, they came from my thoughts and deductions of a Green nature, where I regard everything 'normal' in our society with scepticism, and so the 'traditional' 3-bedroom nuclear family home was recognised as a legitimate target for ideological deconstruction.

It'd be nice to think the PM managed to read them, but I'm sure she has an ear to these precise points, being an Intelligent and Considerate Woman, as I regard her to be.

Here are the questions, cleaned-up slightly.


Questions to the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard”


Prime Minister Julia Gillard, what evidence do you or the government have, which you or the government can provide the People of Australia, which proves beyond doubt that the accepted-as-standard housing model, commonly referred-to as 'the three-bedroom, nuclear family home', is the most effective and most economical form of housing for families, and for the raising of children?

Can the government provide evidence which confirms, or otherwise, that this standard housing model, and/or it's variants, with less or more than, say, 3 bedrooms, with the other basic 'rooms' a family would require to be able to live to a certain 'quality' of life as most Australians expect and aspire to, rooms such as bathroom, toilet, lounge-or-living room, etc, is the most suitable to, most economically, that-is, most efficiently, raise children, for them to grow into stable, mentally, intellectually, Spiritually, and physically healthy adults?

What evidence can the government provide, which can prove, one way or the other, that other housing-and-home models, and thus, other 'family' models, such as the 'Extended Family', which shares the housing, nurturing, domestic work or chores, social, moral and ethical learning-and-development, and personal skills-set instruction and guidance, of children upto the traditional age-of-consent (here 16 years of age), with more-than 2 primary-care-givers, such-as aunties and uncles, grandmothers-and-fathers, cousins and trusted relations and friends, living in-or-on the one premises, other than the traditional, Christian model of housing and parenting, of one father and one mother, are not better than what we take for granted as the two-parent, nuclear family standard in Australia today?

In other words, can the government of Australia prove beyond doubt, that the 'one mother, one father model family', accommodated in the traditional '3 bedroom' (suburban) home, is the best size and model for the Full and Wholesome Maturation of their children?

I ask these questions, because, after some 20 years observing and investigating the veracity of 'the traditional Australian family-and-home model', of 3-bedroom houses on a 1/4-acre land site, designed to house two adults (the parents), and one, two, three or more children, with no more than the two parents providing onsite adult assistance, is most definitely one of the greatest nurturing, learning, social and indeed, cultural failures of our times.

Therefore, madame prime minister, can the Australian government disprove that what most Australians have been indoctrinated to aspire to live in, as adults desiring to produce offspring, the traditional 3-bedroom suburban house, on the accepted standard 1/4-acre block of land, is in fact one of the biggest contributors to mentally unhealthy and unstable adults, as well as being the biggest contributor to unsustainable, inefficient, uneconomic and mentally, intellectually and thus Spiritually retarded adults, thus, societies?

Can the government, madame prime minister, provide the People of Australia with any proof that this/these accepted housing, land and 2-parent family-unit models, are not the most dangerous models to the nation's, and thus to the planet's environment​, and that in fact, they are the most heinous example of housing and parenting, which are designed purely and cold-heartedly for the banking and allied housing construction developers, speculators and real estate industry to most-callously profit from, at the expense of the People, of the Nation, of the Environment and of the Planet?

I think not, madame prime minister!

Therefore, madame prime minister, I here-and-now call for a government inquiry, by the most Respected Members of our federal parliament, into the veracity of both the standard 'nuclear family', of one mother and one father, to nurture and raise children to mental, intellectual and social/cultural maturity, and for a government inquiry into the veracity of the standard 'nuclear family home', of the accepted standard of three bedrooms or thereabouts, situated on it's own 1/5th-of-an-acre, 1/4-acre, 1/3rd-of-an-acre, or thereabouts, block of land, fenced-off-and-distinct from other houses of the same basic design-and-size, accommodating nuclear families of the same basic 2-parent size, on the smallest possible blocks of land that a house-and-land-salesperson can sell, using as the pretext the dangerously false notion, that these human family-and-housing dimensions are healthy for the individuals and for the wider society, community, nation and the planet.

I seek to table these questions, because I believe that there is more than enough evidence to prove, that what we have been conned to accept in the most important and extremely delicate business, or process, of nurturing children to become Wise, Intelligent and Honorable Adults, as distinct from the generally appalling stereotypes of currently living adult Australian Human Beings, the 'nuclear family' and the 'nuclear family home' are absolute and deadly disasters!

I submit that these 'family and housing stereotypes' are but the result of selfish and deluded social designers, who themselves, either born into extreme wealth or came upon more wealth than has been healthy for their own mental, intellectual and Spiritual Balance, indoctrinated in deceitful institutions we call 'private schools' and 'universities', were not of Wisdom enough to be allowed to hold the well-being of whole communities in their power, or in their hands, and, that they 'designed' what we-the-majority have come to stupidly accept as 'the standard' for family and for family housing, purely so that they, or their financiers, large-land-owners, inheritors and/or-speculators-all, were assured of the maximum-possible financial return, by their subdividing and selling-off the smallest-possible parcels of land to the lesser classes, who sought, reasonably, and quite rightly, a secure site of land upon which to raise their children.

As well as these questions madame prime minister, I put it to the house, that the current Victorian premier, one Edward 'Ted' Baillieu, be formally asked for his answers on these same questions, with the clear and open intent of establishing whether his wealth, and thus his inherited 'position' in Victorian and Australian society, and his position as leader of the Liberal/National Parties in the Victorian parliament, can be Honorably Justified, in consideration of the fact that he inherited his wealth, social stature and advantage from early land speculators, who in the late 1800s, defrauded banks, the government of the day, and hundreds and possibly thousands of Victorian home-seekers with quite unsound and unethical land sales' practices.

I ask that it be asked of the current Victorian Premier Baillieu, because it is so, I am firm in my belief, that his own ancestors were in part responsible for an horror which Australia has soon to face, of a cultural, social and environmental 'meltdown', caused in large part from the deeply awry land-and-housing sizes and models we now know as pernicious to the overall and individual, Wise, Intelligent and Honorable maturation and well-being of all Australians, and thus question as to whether he therefore has the right to assume any position of prestige or authority over other Australians?

I think NOT, madame prime minister!

To this, we must ask whether any attempt should be made to rectify these impending disasters, through the courts of law in the state of Victoria, and in our federal courts, by bringing to account the descendants of those who initiated these heinous crimes against the People of Australia.

In regard to today's visit by our prime minister, to Alice Springs' 'Town Camps', I call the prime minister to bring out in full, these heinous crimes against the First Peoples of Australia, so dispelling forever the erroneous social models and false expectations the white, pseudo-Christian, invader Australian society is so foolishly imposing upon those Wisest People - Australia's Aborigines.

If it can be established that the descendants of those who initiated these heinous crimes against the People of Australia now live 'the high life' from the rude profits of their ancestors passed misdeeds, when they selfishly and, in reality, most unethically, went about acquiring Aboriginal Land, (usually with other people's money, lent by utterly immoral banks upon whose boards they themselves sat), through the genocide of Our Aborigine Peoples, dividing it up singularly for their own greedy profit-taking, so that they and their descendants could live far above the reasonable and ethical life, lives which deceived the rest of the People into desiring what we now know as non-short-of-evil, excessive, opulent and totally unsustainable existences, then I call on all members of the Australian federal government to stand together and officially seek to rectify the situation, situations, such as the appalling conditions the Central Australian Aborigine are forced to adapt-to and live-in, of, nuclear family homes.

All Praise the Immortals!

All Praise the Warriors who have fallen Fighting for a Just World!



From the Traveling 4x4 Tent of
Omaxa bin Eartha
aka Max Earth

Anchor, for
Outlaw Junction
Media Portal
for the
Three  Wise  Tribes
ReBalance
GLOBAL

Advocating
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Family,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education &
Environmental
LAW REFORM

ULURUBA


apologies for strange text size or formatting..., spooks in the machine!