130524 My
Comment to Google+ Philosophy - Can Nanotechnology Create Utopia
Looking for somewhere outside my tiny window of
these blog spots, I scan Google+ for seductive comments on subjects I
find interesting.
I've thrown about a dozen of my comments to
this couple of “communities” sites to now, but don't feel at all
comfortable, if because I don't get any responses, or added comments
from others there.
This makes me suspect that ASIO and their
upperclasshole masters from the dark sides of MI6 and the CIA, etc,
are interfering somehow, or that my thoughts are so-o-o far out of
date - out of time - out of any reality others experience - that I
either scare others away to other “communities”, where the don't
have to read my shit, or my shit sends people off to - do I wish? -
think more deeply about the shit THEY write, or to suicide?
Whatever, I re-read the things I post, and
reckon that they're generally deeper than the common comments, still
pertinent, but do go off-topic I guess, even if my perspectives are
admittedly - how can they be otherwise? - very different to those
posted by others who still live within social “levels” of
thought, and ways of - perhaps through a greater necessity -
regarding/narrowing the world around them-us?
But I am depressed that I'm so far out of
touch, either in how to co-communicate, even online in this separated
way, and/or think, about the things others post, to elicit thoughts,
and how they see it all so differently to myself.
I gotta say, observing these occurrences,
serves to make me less confident or happy or desirous of life,
Especially with the bitter and I still say, ignorant egomaniacal
females who use this medium to play with their 8,000 volts of
witchcraft, ignoring the issues that I can only assume, from here,
are important, and need to be expanded upon with our Highest Human
Faculty - not of the clitoral witch crafts, as women now so readily
resort to, thus eliminating their own higher intellect - but our
Intellect.
But, contrary to wise advice, which would say
“don't tell a witch they're an egomaniac!” I do not shy from
talking true, even while it encourages fools to be evil on my soul.
As best as I can determine, the world is in a
seriously parlous condition, illusion or not, and it's clear to me
from my observations and research of over 30 years that this magic
and egomania, ESPECIALLY in women, has a lot to do with us all being
led, raced, pushed, into the bottomless hole of a nasty death of life
on earth.
I guess, from what I've seen on that Google+
“communities” pages, that I can relate the experience so far to
my days - er - nights - driving taxis.
But so far, I accept because I am not in the
same language-usage, thought-space, concept perception and of course,
4th dimensional zones everyone else is in, so I am
“retarded” as-it-were, but so far it is lesser than my nights
driving others around Melbourne, Brisbane, Alice Springs, as I did
over the last 30 years, on and off.
Nevertheless.., Conversations with passengers
in the cabs ranged from insulting, vicious, abusive, hostile, to
enlightening, highly enjoyable, humorous, mood lifting, very
informative, deep, and all in between.
On average though, those nights were about 80%
bland, or dower, and 20% made up for the negs, enough to say I really
enjoyed the job, as scary to most as it always has been.
So, to now, the communities, but two or three
I've joined on Google+ are nowhere near that percentage. I guess it's
a different thing really, to cabs, and to who I was then, and am now,
and, to how real people out there communicate.
From a psycho-analytical point of view, these
are inneresting on why people use this medium, why they join these
types of communities, etc?
I hesitate to go to other communities, for my
“weird” views throwing people, driving them away, for my limited
knowledge on any other more specific community topic, for being new
to most everything others are familiar with and adept at.
But in the 2 or 3 I look at, they seem shallow,
and may indicate that the mainstream are not deep thinkers, on the
pretext that I AM!? Or simply aren't interested in delving into the
“whys” and “what fors”, I have been built to go to, and to
apparently, allegedly, think deeply about.
Certainly,
my expressed penchant, of Land Distribution Reforms, draw total
silence in these formats!
Should
I be surprised? Of course not.
And
as for my other one, of putting to the world that we really do have
to engage our Highest Intellectual Faculties [HA! The BIG HIF!!!]
and grow beyond the whole deadly fraud of “leaders” in politics
and thus, even harder for most to consider, of “leaders” in
business, and in society, in sports therefore, and on and on?
Well...,
either I am not of this world anymore, never was, or have taken
myself so far out of it, dare I say “above it”, as to be
incapable of communicating such concepts to them.
Sure,
like “Land Distribution Reforms” the weight of evil selfishness
profiting from this lack of equity makes my collected scientific
deductions that we would all be enormously happier and wealthier if
the world embraced global land reforms completely out of any
possibility.
So,
“Laws not leaders” is a wasted topic for most, still intelligent,
and I guess clear thinking members on the communities Google+ offers.
However,
it is clear to myself, that this format, perhaps especially for it
being through the very mainstream medium of Google, is not for
serious thought, thinkers, or as serious thinkers would know too
well, for any genuine Revolutionary discussions, and I'd agree,
because these mainstream formats are totally under the view and
monitoring of the scum-sucking fucking psychos of the CIA, MI6, ASIO,
Mossat, etc.
However,
most do seem very 1st world, for having the time and
computer/internet facilities to spend on this medium.
And,
as it is a given for middle-upper class people to not go to the
serious socio-political issues, because it/they challenges their 1,
low, self-interested shallow materialistic lives, 2, challenges
therefore, their egoism, 3, challenges therefore, their laziness of
mind, and 4, their fear of genuine intelligent thoughts and concepts
and people, 5, of having thence, to face up to their own narrowness
of mind, of seeing the world totally as there to satisfy their own
little legendary lives. ET CETERA!
So,
I expect my chatting to the screen via Google+ will not last long.
Unless
I decide that it's a Wildman's DUTY to keep hammering the
middle-upper classes who use it, for entertainment, to pass their
idle time, to help themselves believe they can mix-it with
intelligent people, who do the same as I and use the fora to push
what they see needs to be pushed, and keep up, surfing the
communities for something REALLY CHUNKY, to partake in conversation
on?
Unlesssss.....,
But
certainly, it does not have me wake up in the mornings thinking
YIPPEE!
But,
I guess..., it's all good!
Life's
short enough to endure, even the Harry Festers.
-=-=-=-=-=-
So,
here's one chewy thought I threw to one of the Google+ pages 'tother
day, elicited for the preceding statements by Jimmy Khann, and by
[the snip I took of] the video included in the debate point.
I
don't watch many vids, here on in news pages, for the cost of
downloading them, so no doubt my replies are less than able to
consider the length of what is put in the vids and the responses from
others.
But,
all in all, shit it'd be nice to get comparative responses from
others herein? FUCK ASIO, and every wealthy piece of shit playing
with their dick magic to screw my life and Genuine Human Justice of
Land Distribution Reforms under.
There's a video clip attached to this post. I tried to take a screen shot just for the connection, but the snipping tool failed repeatedly for some strange reason? Perhaps the face on it, the Asian Fella I refer to, didn't like my thinks on their technocratic beliefs? Humpfh! Typical! Sure he's a smart and nice bloke though. "Miko" somebody...?
There's a video clip attached to this post. I tried to take a screen shot just for the connection, but the snipping tool failed repeatedly for some strange reason? Perhaps the face on it, the Asian Fella I refer to, didn't like my thinks on their technocratic beliefs? Humpfh! Typical! Sure he's a smart and nice bloke though. "Miko" somebody...?
Item posted by
Jimmy Khann
- May 22, 2013
“In the
future when technology is boundless, money will merely exist,
therefore our system of money will dramatically change, basically
flipping the whole system, for money will not rule people but the
majority of people will rule.”
[I'm
not sure this quote is by Jimmy Khann]
Max Cook
May 24, 2013
Apologies for the
length of this...?
130524
It seems these
are all based on the assumption that food, and clean air and water,
etc, will still be readily available up the track? Seems like the
space/future dreamers talking about colonizing Mars?
But I live in a
very different "luddite" 3D-only rustic isolated forested
or desert reality to pretty much every other person on earth now, who
I think know those problems are, like the rest of it, all part of a
manufacturable illusion.
So nice
scenarios, nice dreams, can be made into reality, or into one they
can transpose themselves into, leaving any tragic global ecological
collapse back in the previous 3D illusion.
If this is the
actual case for the 'awake' minds now, then all speculation, worry
and hopes, expectations ambitions etc etc, become superfluous.
Techies,
technocrats could even become their computers, or merely electrical
impulses, and, like Hollywood made, leaping from circuit to circuit
as their desires, or demands preferred.
As put in the
1960s, "Nothing is real!"
Not even, perhaps
- being stuck in 3D - the planet upon which it appears our physical
mortal coil relies for that food and clean air and water?
Certainly
however, does not auger well for a united human species on this
apparently preferred satellite of the Great Father Sun, if 8, 9, 15
billion of us have that basic organic need, beneath all our
individual ideations?
Conflict would be
inevitable, much as we see now, but on immensely multiplied extents,
with larger and minuscule battles raging for space in the great big
illusion?
This, all
speculation on my behalf, it must be said.
Wars and poverty,
pretty much every thing our history books tells us occurred, and
climate and economic and astrophysical scientists predict for the
future, as well, are unreal.
Or, for example,
if someone is a warmonger, encoded if-I-may, not being an adept in
that word's fields, to be a Warrior, and grows into regarding war as
Honorable, the right thing to do, all things considered in their
reality, then they will find or create their own world of war.
Likewise for dainty little - er - petite women, will create a world
of flower gardens.
Or bikers, a
world of trick scoots, and grouse hot rods......
Our Australian
Aborigines, in the early days of the invasion, when asked, coined the
[English] term for their reality, "The Dreaming".
So these concepts
put above appear to be, but are they possible, and why, did the Wise,
ageless Aborigine choose the Dreaming, of living in 100 percent
concordance with the natural environment, and with the spiritual
realms?
Was it possibly,
because they were still at one with the ultimate reality, had never
gone off the path, like the Adam and Eve out of Eden are said to
have, and were thus actually still, always at peace with themselves,
thus were able to maintain a peace, for upto 100,000 years, with
every other Nations here? [upto the 1788 invasion, there were an
estimated 520-plus nations of different Bleck Fellas here, all with
their own similar but different cultures, languages, etc]
They invented the
"Boomerang" for Buddha's sake, showing they understood the
aeronautics of flight magnificently, and yet were content, and wise
enough to not seek endless desire for more more more of technological
advance.
Sure, they came
upon the Aussie continent as the first peoples, so were not in
constant contention over territory, thus food, and wives, etc.,
mainly for having the "fabled" to us, golden rules and mean
of the Jewish "Garden of Eden" peoples.
And it's
certainly not my argument that technology is but a product of
warmongers, needing to ever-advance their attack equipment and
defenses, against a similarly never-content, nor ever wise enough
enemy to negotiate an enduring truce, treaty or peace.
Therefore, the
need to keep advancing technology may well be founded in some errant
part of our being, of our existence, of our psychology, which cannot
find the opposite of war, that is “peace”?
This, I know, is
at the crux of most all western modern bothering, drive to build
build build, more jobs, more construction, more depletion of the
environment and natural resources. And on the personal, individual
level[s], our insatiability and constant escape into dreamed-up
technology to keep our ever-forward-looking mind constantly
electrified.
As if being
electrified is our warring modern psychological genre's belief of
what being happy is?
This, without
doubt - ask a Buddhist Monk - portends a nasty and usually insane
end, as well as, in the end, being fruitless in the personal search
for contentment.
So...? At what
cost, do we each seek these dreams and satisfactions?
Is there a
fundament we all need and must share, in this human, earthly level of
existence, which we all, in which ever reality we fabricate for our
own, must respect, and allow to work as it has from the planet's
first spin off from the molten Sun, or such?
But, is this all
just the illusion I'm stuck in?
“In the future
when technology is boundless, money will merely exist, therefore our
system of money will dramatically change, basically flipping the
whole system, for money will not rule people but the majority of
people will rule.” unquote.
Very “The
Matrix” ending with Neo lifting off at the phone booth, rocketing
skyward.
WOW! I do not
know, but accept it might be possible, and even sustainable, whatever
happens to this apparent pending eco-collapse and ensuing global
wars, endless wars.
But wary of
Hollywood's typical short-fall endings, with much illogic and
unexplained nor explainable, are we being led into the metaphorical
“ditch”?
By technocrats?
With SFX?
Et CeFXera?
Hmmm? Chewy!
Whether those
words were too off-topic for other contributors or not, I still think
they're pertinent to the underlying discussion, and, to the
infeasible question put in the title written on the video frontpage,
of “Can Nanotechnology Create Utopia?”
Whoever,
the shown Asian fella or not, asked that question, they would do well
to define for themselves the meaning of the word “Utopia”. As I
recall, it sort of means “an unattainable place”, a “perfect
world” one we can never actually arrive at.
“Mythical
place” “Imaginary place” “Fictitious place” are 3
definitions given on my Open Office Writer software Thesaurus.
However,
I can't say these are not places we can never actually find, build or
inhabit, because I am convinced that everything is illusion, thus, of
the mind, thus, of the imagination.
So
they might - erHUM - they ARE well ahead of me in that regard, for I
don't seem anymore to have enough of an imagination to get beyond my
own shithole, or is it mum's or that evil pack of psycho-wolves, the
Theosophical Society's delusion?
Ho-fucking-HUM!
Don't
care anymore! I DEFY!!!
[sadmax]
JUST DEFIANCE
Gunai
Aborigine Outlaw
Australia.
All
Praise the Immortals!
All
Praise the Warriors who have fallen
Fighting
for a Just World!
from
the Traveling 4x4 Tent of
JUST
DEFIANCE
aka
GENERAL
BLUE MEANEE
Anchor,
for
Hell's
Gate Warmongers
GLOBAL
Advocating
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Family,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education
&
Environmental
LAW
REFORM
