130722 JUST
DEFIANCE Vote YES For Local Council Recognition In The Proposed
Referendum Edition
But not without
MAJOR CORRECTIONS to the Constitution, and other key laws.
Yesserday, I
searched the 'net for the word “treason” and it's definitions,
because I was prompted once more by local henchmen of corruption
harassment, to check if treason is the applicable word, in charging
them with what turns out to be the more appropriate “upholding
corrupt laws”.
Treason means
“the illegal deposing of a head of state”, more or less.
And how archaic
is that? It comes down to the 21st century from something
like the 14 century, before anything like “democracy” or fair and
equal rules of behavior in courts of law, before evidence was
possible to use in one's defense, or in accusing another of a crime.
Before evidence had to be considered by any ruling authority like a
judge or magistrate, or monarch. Especially in such cases where a
monarch or warlord held sway over a people, and, as was the norm for
millennia no doubt, regard themselves as gods, with sovereign powers
to say rule and do whatever the fuck they liked to the masses, their
“subjects”.
So “treason”
is in fact, perhaps the very antithesis of “Democratic Rule” “By
the People, For the People”, because if the people see the
leaders/rulers/monarchs are not being fair, they should have the
right to at least challenge any autocrat, if not the legal right to
remove them.
I might be wrong,
but I think it is still an active rule today, in Australia and in
Britain etc. From memory the US Constitution has in it that the
people have the constitutional right to challenge the government if
there is evidence that the government is not ruling in their best
interests. And so it should be! EVERYWHERE!.
Nevertheless....,
I got links to Wikipedia, and they were typically very informative,
on treason.
But another link
caught my eye, so I hit it, and it went to a very inneresting series
of pages.
After reading a
lot of it [for me], a few more items and links showed me the people
behind the sites were some christian mob, and very anti-ALP.
But perhaps
more-so, anti the “left-wing” global powerbrokers of the United
Nations and it's rather dubious I agree, policies of taking over the
world and asserting some, to myself, warped communist central
authority agenda. I don't question the accuracy of these sites and
of what they exposed to my less-than-well-informed mind about the
plans of the world elite.
To me the same
elite, are off the path, and so are trying to implement guaranteed
“FAIL” systems and governance. But to see this and to criticize
it, does not necessarily mean one is one a better, truer path.
So I see some
expressed policies of the contributors to these webpages go against
the things and issues I've found as what the species need.
So, receiving a
brief reply this morning from them, for the email I sent them
yesserday, I wrote the following back to Larry Hannigan.
For a change, I
don't regard this mob as evil bastards or such, and give them credit
for what they are doing, albeit that I disagree with their policies
and beliefs, some part of them being right wing christian.
Here's the link
to Larry's site. He and his team do seem to be doing some good stuff
in terms of law. I question whether they're coming from the best,
most impartial position, but nevertheless, appreciate the accusations
and revelations they go to.
Even though my
own inquiries into politrix and economics arrive at pro-Communist
bases, based not on faith and mere belief, but on the sciences of
demography, economics and human/land distribution, I am very much at
odds with the supposed plans the global elite, in the guise of the
UN, ILO, IMF and other organizations have for us.
If I do have a
clearer perception of life, and of religion and politics and
economics, and if they are closer to correct than the masses and than
the elites, whom I charge with all being seriously WRONG WAY
thinkers, then it is a given that the plans devised by them are gonna
be wrong also.
But challenging
them is one thing. Ensuring the challenge comes from a more pure
base, is quite something else again.
Every
oppositional force and group out of the most ancient lines and tribes
from the northern, 'whiteguy” strains, have been off the path since
the “fall from Eden” as I put it, so seeing sinister intentions
in catholic/communist/corporate elites by their ideological enemies
the protestant/freemason/corporate elites, is only gonna exacerbate
the tensions, divisions, antitheses and wars between them.
This is exactly
whats been happening for centuries if not millennia, and is what's
going on now, with the rising-falling tensions between left and right
wing powers, aka on the surface, the USA and Russia/China. All of
whom, work and subvert and conspire underneath the larger global
umbrella organization of the ? Which name are they known as today???
Take your pick?
Me? I'll shovel
it, and stay out here in JUST DEFIANCE of all their warped and
frantic ideals and plans to construct their towers of Babel.
All added up,
it's one massive FUCK UP, and any who partake of the power games and
clubs and gangs, only add to the fuck ups, I reckon.
Far better, more
Honorable, methinks, if we were all to drop our plans and delusional
beliefs, and retreat to something like Buddhist or Taoist Cooperative
Agrarian farms, re-learning almost everything we've come to accept as
good and the norm for our species.
But, clearly,
fanatical enemies [essentially of their own True Spirit and Nature],
would love to see their opposition retire to the forests and to
Meditating on trippy bells and flutes, so the fucking brutal psychos
can march over everyone else and delude themselves they are the
winners.
So..., it becomes
a conundrum, as to whether it's best to retreat from any such
BOOOLLLSHSHSHSHIT feud/battle/bitch/war, and seek one's own personal
peace and Yogic Enlightenment, thus leaving evil to prosper, or to
return to the fray, and fight to the end against the sons of bitches,
just to not let the scum get away with any undeserved and typically
completely unjust victory.
The decision is,
“which side does one join?”
But there, we are
usually less than fully informed as to “sides”. Because there
are never really just two options.
Leaping and
taking one or the other side is where it all goes wrong.
Usually we are
forced to make that choice, because one or both “sides” are 1,
already psychotic, and 2, are eager to have as many numbers on their
side as they can “volunteer/lure/bribe of force”.
Always, there are
doubts as to the sum-total veracity of any side we see as joining.
And each and every side in a war of these kind, has multiple flaws
and even if in a Machiavellian sense, many unseen evils, if not basic
flaws in their arguments.
But these days,
time is of the essence, and victory or defeat rely on relatively fast
decisions. So an aspirant, or merely someone, say, a child nearing
adulthood and some time when they have to choose one side or another,
can easily make the wrong choice, and not find out until it's too
late.
So I don't know
how to get passed this conundrum for newbies, other than to advise
that they really should research the options as much as they can, and
from as early an age as they can absorb the information and compute
it correctly and fully.
“Family” ties
are no basis to choose from. Neither are schools, churches,
religions, clubs, gangs, or mates.
As far as I can
best discern, again, it comes down to studying the Sciences of Law.
Not false corrupt
and FUCK EVERYTHING elitist western laws, but the Fundamental and
Universal Laws of Physics, how they operate, how they influence
everything, even how our minds wax and weave for their influences on
our “humors” [a word from older tymes] , and thus how we view the
world through our physical senses, and how they, the universal laws
of Physics, influence the world on the levels of human to human and
human to the land relationships.
1st,
such a path can only foster a high regard and appreciation of and for
our Intellects, as the highest of all our faculties, and 2nd,
have us therefore best equipped to make the best decisions. This, in
terms of joining one side or another, all things considered, because
it might well be best to accept the flaws of either side in the short
term, if a higher goal can be attained to by working with that mob.
But, for myself,
being now on the outer to death, this would, or should inspire
everyone both within established groups, gangs, clubs and parties,
etc., and on the verge of making that decision, to work first and
foremost to ensure they are following good laws ultimately, so 1,
their own mob are of the highest intellectual fabric and foundation,
and 2, that they thus attract by reason, not by any other means,
newcomers, and 3, therefore, for all their gang's charters being
incorruptible, un-subvertable, are guaranteed the ultimate final
victory. Victory, not over the other blokes, but merely over the
so-called “darkness” that the Great Buddha called “ignorance”.
To me, that's the
only way the species is gonna have a future not drowned in what I
expect, for us, and for myself, eternal war.
So, here's the
link to “the other side's” webpages. Worth a look for the facts
they throw a light on, as to the performances of our political “left
wingers”. But I don't think a majority will be taken in completely
in regards their “lesser” ideologies [hyuk!] and antipathetic
political theories and beliefs.
Larry
Hannigan’s Australia
Thanks Larry.
Here are more
than a few thoughts on the state of the species, and of laws and this
chimera "the constitution", etc.
As said, I'm but
a puppet, and too late came to see how much I've been misled, and
also how much I do not know nor unnerstand about the complexities of
things like the constitution, and the laws surrounding it.
But from your
webpages, and my decades of essentially superficial thoughts on the
whole matter of government, economics and the rubbish we know as
"politics", I am still inclined to believe that all the
complexities of such "laws" are but means of protecting the
foreign-based elite, "political class", their upclub legal
and other "professionals".
The same applies
methinks, to the intricate mechanisms and rules within the
constitution.
Accepting first,
that all our "laws" are not "laws" at all, but
means of controlling the Demos, the People, so that the ancient
lineages of the world's super-wealthy can keep living in excess as
they have always been, means we have to reappraise everything we take
for granted as regards "laws", and which actual "Laws"
have to be "reborn" if-I-may, and made known right across
the masses, and of course, across the planet.
One thing is
certain, that the species will not stop the cultural decline unless
it addresses our underlying flaws on a global scale.
If any "lobby
group", confederacy of organizations, or such, are to really be
effective, they have to get underneath all the smear-jobs laid upon
every aspect of our education and culture and become absolutely
dedicated to reinvigorating the knowledge of the basic laws.
Then, of course,
the collective must thereafter commit to protecting the knowledge at
all costs.
But getting
underneath the smear-jobs, means we have willfully to, if we keep to
a True and Intelligent course, disgorge our minds of the mountains of
rubbish, which includes the vast majority of the cultural rubbish
such as the religious beliefs, social customs and preferred, blindly
accepted habits.
Far too much to
ask of most white, westernized mainstreamers, because, it challenges
everything the most of them have been steeped in by the overwhelming
culture [of corruption] they're born in.
But mostly, it
would, again, if keeping to the "straight and narrow", have
them voluntarily drop 99% of every thing and belief they've assumed
into their lives, and become pretty much the very antithesis of our
western culture - Nomads, possessing next to no product of the
mainstream commodity-consumption culture.
This idea shocks
most whiteguys, clearly, because they're so long sold [lost] on
believing material wealth is the source of personal happiness.
Any True
Thinker/Philosopher knows this is not the case.
So on the
surface, it would appear that, for any reduction in the general
decline of our world and species, to being a reversal of the endemic
destruction written into our "whiteguy" cultural DNA,
demands we drop everything and become on-the-face-of-it, rootless
wanderers.
But no. I
actually defer to the Wise Ways of our Australian and indeed all
Aborigines, who were not actually rootless, but had, from the
earliest time, very Wisely Structured Customs and Ways in their
Nomadic Cultures.
But, a majority
of modern world people returning to those perennial Traditions? HA!
So..., if any of
us choose to dedicate our lives to making straight the laws of all
lands, then we have to figure out what we have, and how we can work
with it toward the best possible feasible, achievable end.
Again, gaining
any majority of support is fairyland stuff, and I think the species
does not have centuries for any "Fabianist"-type passive
change to be effective.
This then, to my
way of thinking, begs a Coup D'Etat.
And usually, that
demands some central group with some leader beginning and leading the
charge.
But I do maintain
that the whole notion of "leaders" is "lost tribes"
thinking.
Also, today, with
electronic and occult means of communications at their peak [short of
the "next invention" in technology. Mockery there.] the
notion of "leaders", which has more failings in it than
Scientific Merit, is superfluous. the same applies to "political
parties".
As I now tend to
harp on about, it is "LAWS, not Jesus!" aka not "leaders"
that we need.
And that is in
the most simple distribution of the primary Knowledge of Economics,
which is the Science on how the species relates with our resources -
the land.
Arriving at that,
should have us also find that the laws of distribution are, or should
be amazingly simple. Pure, and open us to being happier than ever.
At least since 1788, [from an Aborigine's perspective].
And..., here is
where I dispute what I see written in your pages, about the evils of
the proposed Referendum on giving local councils recognition in the
federal Constitution.
I do agree that
they too are ridden with corruption. But again, this has it's roots
in the laws, of the land.
From my studies
[as you'd see, I'm an autodidact], it's not the local councils that
are our problem in terms of making government simple, efficient and
effective, but the middle tier, state governments.
They belong to
the past, to colonialism, and to the "tyrannies of the
distances" across our wide brown and green and gold land, and to
a pre-telecommunications era.
But studies to
this arrives at the whole structure having to be "upturned"
so that a proper system of government, is 1, minimalist, and 2, has
all revenue collected at the local level, by the local councils, and
any funds needed to maintain the federal or national level of
coordination, be directed from the locals UP to the nation's central
"committee".
This would, in
the perfect world [HA!] be Democracy at it's purest and finest, no
doubt.
So, demonizing
local councils is incorrect, albeit that they are as corrupted now,
in the present state of massive global offshore corruption of the
good laws of the land.
"Good laws
of the land", as were brought with the First Fleet, implemented
by successive governors up until Governor William Bligh's deposition,
and were destroyed by John MacArthur's "rum rebellion" in
1808.
However, I don't
criticize your accusations against the ALPs subversion's of the
mentioned oaths and rule for our lawyers, etc.
But from my
perspective, as many a good lawyer has said over time, the system of
English/British law is massively corrupt, and has been for ages.
So any
"allegiance" our down-under lawyers are or have been
expected to swear to, may well be not in our own nation's best
interests.
Indeed, it is
more than likely that they are swearing allegiance to those foreign
powers who actually own us, "...lock, stock, and barrel".
The old British
East India Company, latterly the International Monetary Fund, IMF,
who bought the English parliament out of debt, incurred after the
failed 1776 American war of independence, "...lock, stock, and
barrel".
That included
everything then and now, under the administration of the parliament.
All her colonies, and all her military forces.
We, who call
ourselves "Australians" are no more than "chattels",
and all our lands, but resources owned completely, by the IMF
privately owned multinational corporation, which is why these issues
you rightly address, are able to be driven through without anything
near to a Democratic decision.
So.., thanks for
opening my eyes more again to the travesties of our so-called
democracy, and apologies for sending you my contrary thoughts and
divinations on the issues you champion.
Yes, "the
Republic" is probably as much a scam to deceive us of even more
democratic authority.
However, being
myself the puppet of the current IMF/British dynastic elites,
conceived to inherit it all, from what I've learned over my 40-plus
years of inquiry, the Republic, Properly Structured, is Democracy,
far more than any "Constitutional Monarchy" can ever be.
Cheers,
JUST DEFIANCE
Brayakooloong
Gunai Aborigine Outlaw
Australia.
I doubt I've won
any friends wherever they are [Melbourne Victoria, I think?], and
whether they can think outside the trances of their brand of jewish
branch office christianity is doubtful, but I reckon I gave them as
good or better than they offer on their pages, and thus, maybe for
them, some food for thought.
But knowing the
WRONG WAY christians as I did, if anything I wrote here to them wins
their agreement, they'll more likely fall back into automaton mode
christian trance-ism, and subvert it to their way of seeing the world
and Jesus, and overlook completely the basis of my
assertions/postulations/theories/hypotheses and facts, about leaders
and laws, etc.
Hohum....
All
Praise the Immortals!
All
Praise the Warriors who have fallen
Fighting
for a Just World!
from
the Traveling 4x4 Tent of
JUST
DEFIANCE
aka
GENERAL
BLUE MEANEE
Anchor,
for
Hell's
Gate Warmongers
GLOBAL
Advocating
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Family,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education
&
Environmental
LAW
REFORM
